Sunday, July 5, 2015

The Sunday Miscellanea - Tanz der Hornochsen! (2004)

One of the card games that sees regular lunchtime play round the Lake Geneva area is Tanz der Hornochsen! (2004).  The cards have also been used to form the basis for many other games that have been made up in the moment or thought up and played by locals, perhaps even refined at the table.  It's a very creative bunch and coming up with new games to play and new ways to play old ones is heartily encouraged.

The description from Board Game Geek is as follows:
In 6 nimmt!, a.k.a. Category 5 and many other names, you want to score as few points as possible.
To play the game, you shuffle the 104 number cards, lay out four cards face-up to start the four rows, then deal ten cards to each player. Each turn, players simultaneously choose and reveal a card from their hand, then add the cards to the rows, with cards being placed in ascending order based on their number; specifically, each card is placed in the row that ends with the highest number that's below the card's number. When the sixth card is placed in a row, the owner of that card claims the other five cards and the sixth card becomes the first card in a new row.
In addition to a number from 1 to 104, each card has a point value. After finishing ten rounds, players tally their score and see whether the game ends. (Category 5 ends when a player has a score greater than 74, for example, while 6 nimmt! ends when someone tops 66.) When this happens, the player with the fewest points wins!
6 nimmt! works with 2-10 players, and the dynamics of gameplay change the more players that you have. One variant for the game has you use 34 cards, 44 cards, 54 cards, etc. (instead of all 104 cards) when you have three, four, five, etc. number of players. This change allows you to know which cards are in play, thereby allowing you to track which cards have been played and (theoretically) make better choices as to which card to play when.

Simple enough.  We play a lot.  I've proposed on multiple occasions that we play the game as written but allow for someone to win if they manage to hit 66 exactly, a sort of difficult way out if someone is accumulating points with little hope of getting back in the game.  Several of the group believe this is somehow too easy an out.  I think it is more akin to falling from a ledge and grabbing hold of another on the way down.  Any thoughts from my readers?

Essentially, a clearinghouse for topics on
not covered elsewhere or wanting a particular focus.
Please Like, Share, Plus, Tweet, Follow, and Comment!

No comments: